2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Triumph 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |
