2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1948 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1948 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1948 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2071 kg more than 1948 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1948 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 202 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2460 mm |