2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1948 Simca 8
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1948 Simca 8. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1912 kg more than 1948 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Simca 8. (88 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1948 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Ranger | 8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2450 mm |
