2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1949 Peugeot 203
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1949 Peugeot 203. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1949 Peugeot 203.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Peugeot 203. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Peugeot 203. (80 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1949 Peugeot 203 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 203 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2590 mm |