2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 27 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Ranger | RM A |
Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2870 mm |