2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | Renown |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
