2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | FX |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2620 mm |