2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 MG TD
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG TD would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1952 MG TD. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 MG TD.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 MG TD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG TD. (87 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG TD.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1952 MG TD | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Ranger | TD |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1250 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2390 mm |
