2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 Porsche 356
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1952 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2047 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1952 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Ford | Porsche |
Model | Ranger | 356 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |