2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Hudson Super Jet
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Jet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Jet would be higher. At 3,303 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Jet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Jet. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Jet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 237 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Jet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Jet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Jet (252 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Jet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1953 Hudson Super Jet | |
Make | Ford | Hudson |
Model | Ranger | Super Jet |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3303 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 120.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2670 mm |