2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (149 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 716 kg more than 1953 Humber Pullman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Ford | Humber |
| Model | Ranger | Pullman |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 286 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |
