2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | C-Type |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3440 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |