2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ranger | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3690 mm |
