2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Talbot Baby. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | Ranger | Baby |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3130 mm |