2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |