2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Oldsmobile 88
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Oldsmobile 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Oldsmobile 88 would be higher. At 5,320 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Oldsmobile 88 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Oldsmobile 88 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Oldsmobile 88 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Oldsmobile 88. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Oldsmobile 88 (407 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1954 Oldsmobile 88 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1954 Oldsmobile 88 | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ranger | 88 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 5320 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3110 mm |
