2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1212 kg more than 1954 Pontiac Star Chief.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Star Chief |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3110 mm |