2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1955 MG Magnett
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 MG Magnett would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1955 MG Magnett. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1955 MG Magnett.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 MG Magnett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 MG Magnett. (107 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1955 MG Magnett | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Ranger | Magnett |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2600 mm |
