2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1956 GAZ M-20
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1956 GAZ M-20 | |
| Make | Ford | GAZ |
| Model | Ranger | M-20 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2120 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |
