2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1957 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1957 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1957 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2006 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2720 mm |