2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1958 Holden FE
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Holden FE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1958 Holden FE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | FE |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2670 mm |