2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | 16 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2260 mm |