2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1556 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Ranger | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2980 mm |