2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1961 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1961 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1961 Mazda R 360.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1961 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | R 360 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |