2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | Ranger | Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 110 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |