2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ranger | 300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 71 L |