2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 NSU Prinz
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 NSU Prinz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 NSU Prinz would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1962 NSU Prinz. (30 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 NSU Prinz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 643 kg more than 1962 NSU Prinz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 NSU Prinz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 NSU Prinz. (42 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 NSU Prinz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1962 NSU Prinz | |
| Make | Ford | NSU |
| Model | Ranger | Prinz |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 581 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 37 L |
