2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Steyr 500D
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 500D. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 500D.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Steyr 500D. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 500D. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 500D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1962 Steyr 500D | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | Ranger | 500D |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 2970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 1850 mm |
