2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Steyr 700C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1962 Steyr 700C | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | Ranger | 700C |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 641 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1950 mm |
