2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (111 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1963 Isuzu Bellett | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Ranger | Bellett |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1469 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 40 L |