2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (50 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1963 NSU Wankel Spider | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Ranger | Wankel Spider |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1000 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 34 L |