2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 700 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 29 L |