2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | EH |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2670 mm |