2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2010 mm |