2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 575 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Ranger | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 27 L |