2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |