2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Marcos 1500

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1500. (85 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1500.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Marcos 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1500. (131 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1500.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 1966 Marcos 1500
Make Ford Marcos
Model Ranger 1500
Year Released 2006 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 206 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 131 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 72.7 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1090 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2290 mm