2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 188 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |