2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 558 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
