2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | GT 40 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 72.9 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 125 L |