2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ranger | 240 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |
