2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 57 L |