2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ranger | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 109 L |
