2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda R-100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | R-100 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2270 mm |