2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1968 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 TVR Tuscan (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 TVR Tuscan should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 TVR Tuscan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1968 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Ranger | Tuscan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 65 L |