2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 319 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 889 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 59 L |