2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Ranger | 966 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2170 mm |