2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1926 kg more than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1970 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2430 mm |