2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1971 Lancia 2000
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lancia 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lancia 2000 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1971 Lancia 2000. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1971 Lancia 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 452 kg more than 1971 Lancia 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Lancia 2000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Lancia 2000. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Lancia 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1971 Lancia 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Ranger | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2490 mm |