2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Mazda 818
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 244 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (367 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1972 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 818 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2320 mm |